HR Jobs Are Changing- And So Are Their Salaries
Over the past decade, HR has evolved immensely. Due to our increased reliance and integration of technology, all aspects of a business are changing, including HR. With this change has come a wave of new HR jobs, such as the Chief People Officer and the emergence of “People teams.” While people are becoming increasingly aware of the presence of People Operations in the HR landscape, what many don’t realize is that these changes are not exclusively changes in title, but are actually changes in responsibility, qualifications, and even salary.
Below, we analyzed some of the new positions in the “People” function and compared them with their old HR counterparts. We believe that many times people vote with their wallets and that the increased salaries (and responsibilities) of People Operations is indicative of how this function is evolving.
“New HR” vs. “Old HR” Salaries
Executives: Chief Human Resources Officer vs. Chief People Officer
The CPO and CHRO are the top executives of their respective human resources teams. Although both are high earners compared to other members of their teams, an average CPO significantly outearns a CHRO.
Average CPO Salary: $147,228
Average CHRO Salary: $117,762
Senior Management: HR Director vs. Vice President of People Operations
Although both are responsible for overseeing their teams, the duties of an HR Director and a VP of People Operations do vary. Occupying a more strategic and people-focused position, the VP of people operations is more highly compensated than the human resources director.
Average VP of People Operations Salary: $111,894
Average HR Director Salary: $95,866
Middle Management: HR Manager vs. Manager of People Operations
Although they have similar titles, the HR Manager and the Manager of People Operations have quite different salaries, with the newer People Operations position earning almost ten thousand dollars more per year.
Average Manager of People Operations Salary: $82,326
Average HR Manager Salary: $72,626
Operational Management: HR Coordinator vs. People Operations Coordinator
Serving a more operational, entry-level role, both human resource coordinators and people operations coordinators are some of the lower earners of their respective teams, but the people operations position appears to be more profitable.
Average People Operations Coordinator Salary: $53,474
Average HR Coordinator Salary: $43,850
Salary data from LinkedIn, Glassdoor and ZipRecruiter.
The data above clearly shows us that these newer human resources jobs are earning more, but how significant really is this difference? The graph below provides a more concrete visualization of the salary difference between the two groups.
This graph outlines both the raw salary difference and the percentage difference in salary at each level of employment. In terms of raw salary difference, the most significant difference is between the salaries of the top executives, with a difference of $29,466. The difference between the operational, entry-level positions is the smallest, with a difference of $9,624.
In terms of percentage difference, the greatest difference again occurs at the executive level with the CPO earning 22.24% more on average than the CHRO. The salaries of those in middle management positions have the lowest percentage difference at 12.52%.
An interesting data point to note is that, despite having the smallest raw salary difference, those in operational positions have the second highest percentage difference, with People Operations Coordinators earning 19.78% more on average than HR Coordinators.
Even more significantly, we found that on average, these “New HR” jobs are earning 17.5% more than their older counterparts. As we’ve now seen in the graphs above, this can translate to many thousand dollars per year.
Why the big difference?
While the data suggests that these newer titles are in fact associated with larger salaries, it seems crazy that a title alone could warrant such different compensation. In reality, it’s not just the new titles that are driving these differences, but rather the new responsibilities and skills associated with these new positions that making them more lucrative.
As technology becomes more fully integrated into all aspects of the workplace, all facets of business have faced change, especially human resources. While previously associated with enforcement of rules and regulations and administrative duties such as payroll, benefits and compensation, and the hiring process HR is becoming a more strategic department overall, relying more on data and analytics to meet employee needs while also working towards business goals.
This shift in the HR landscape is emphasized when we compare job posts for a CPO and a CHRO. For the CHRO, the main responsibilities listed include ensuring compliance with company policy, overseeing sourcing and candidate evaluation, and coordinating training and development programs. On the other hand, the responsibilities for the CPO focus on aligning people strategies with business objectives, developing company culture, and driving employee engagement. The CPO job also seeks candidates with a good analytical approach and business savvy, while the CHRO job lists project management skills as one of the most important determining factors for applicants. As we can see from the comparison of their salaries, the CPO’s new duties correspond to higher pay.
For anyone involved human resources, these differences in both responsibilities and salary are significant to pay attention to. Having a better understanding of how the world of HR is evolving could give you a leg up in the workplace and ultimately help you earn more.
About the author: Phil Strazzulla is passionate about educating the HR ecosystem about everything talent acquisition. He began his career working in early-stage investing at Bessemer Venture Partners before getting his MBA at Harvard Business School, which lead him to the HR industry.